Responding to criticism
How to use the Responses content type to publish editorial replies, right-of-reply pieces, and formal responses to outside criticism — transparently and on the record.
Project Broadsheet's Responses content type is designed for a specific editorial situation: a subject, reader, or outside party disputes, challenges, or replies to something you've published, and you want to put that reply on the record in a structured, findable way.
This is distinct from a correction (factual error) or an editor's note (additional context). A response is a first-person reply from someone outside the publication, published under their name, linked to the original article.
When to use a response
- A public official replies to your coverage of their agency.
- An organization disputes a finding in an investigative piece.
- A subject of a profile writes a rebuttal.
- A reader writes a substantive letter that engages directly with a published article.
Responses are not for comments, social media replies, or general reader feedback. They're for formal, on-the-record replies that you've agreed to publish.
Create a response
Responses live in src/responses/. Create a Markdown file:
src/responses/city-official-reply.md
With front matter:
---
title: A Response to "City Council Approves Rezoning Plan"
respondent: Director Jane Smith, City Planning Department
respondentRole: Director, City Planning Department
relatedArticle: /news/city-council-rezoning-plan/
date: 2026-04-20
summary: Director Smith disputes the characterization of the council vote and clarifies the department's position on the proposed zoning changes.
---
The body of the file is the respondent's reply, written in Markdown.
Front matter fields
| Field | Required | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
title | Yes | Page title; typically "A Response to [Original Article Title]" |
respondent | Yes | The person or organization replying |
respondentRole | No | Their title or affiliation |
relatedArticle | Yes | URL of the article being responded to |
date | Yes | Publication date of the response |
summary | Yes | One-sentence summary for indexes and meta description |
Editorial principles
Verify the respondent. Confirm you're publishing a reply from who they claim to be. Don't publish anonymous responses in this format.
Don't edit for substance. Light copy-editing (spelling, punctuation) is acceptable. Removing arguments or changing meaning is not. If you can't publish the response as written, decline it — don't publish a sanitized version without disclosing the changes.
Add an editorial note if needed. You can prepend or append an italicized editor's note below the front matter block:
*Editor's note: This response was submitted by Director Smith on April 18, 2026, in reply to coverage published April 15. It has been lightly edited for spelling and formatted for the web.*
Link from the original article. After publishing the response, edit the original article to link to it. Project Broadsheet doesn't do this automatically — it requires a manual front matter addition.
In the original article's front matter:
relatedResponses:
- /responses/city-official-reply/
Corrections vs. responses
A correction fixes a factual error made by the publication. A response gives the other side a platform. They're not interchangeable. If a response reveals a factual error, publish both: correct the original article and publish the response.
See Corrections for the correction workflow.
What to do next
- Corrections — for factual errors in published articles.
- Source documents — for primary documents cited in your reporting.
- Argument maps — for structured presentation of contested claims.
Browse Support for community channels and paid support options, or book a call if you'd like me to set it up for you.