Responding to criticism

How to use the Responses content type to publish editorial replies, right-of-reply pieces, and formal responses to outside criticism — transparently and on the record.

Content Updated April 18, 2026 v1.0.0

Project Broadsheet's Responses content type is designed for a specific editorial situation: a subject, reader, or outside party disputes, challenges, or replies to something you've published, and you want to put that reply on the record in a structured, findable way.

This is distinct from a correction (factual error) or an editor's note (additional context). A response is a first-person reply from someone outside the publication, published under their name, linked to the original article.

When to use a response

  • A public official replies to your coverage of their agency.
  • An organization disputes a finding in an investigative piece.
  • A subject of a profile writes a rebuttal.
  • A reader writes a substantive letter that engages directly with a published article.

Responses are not for comments, social media replies, or general reader feedback. They're for formal, on-the-record replies that you've agreed to publish.

Create a response

Responses live in src/responses/. Create a Markdown file:

src/responses/city-official-reply.md

With front matter:

---
title: A Response to "City Council Approves Rezoning Plan"
respondent: Director Jane Smith, City Planning Department
respondentRole: Director, City Planning Department
relatedArticle: /news/city-council-rezoning-plan/
date: 2026-04-20
summary: Director Smith disputes the characterization of the council vote and clarifies the department's position on the proposed zoning changes.
---

The body of the file is the respondent's reply, written in Markdown.

Front matter fields

FieldRequiredPurpose
titleYesPage title; typically "A Response to [Original Article Title]"
respondentYesThe person or organization replying
respondentRoleNoTheir title or affiliation
relatedArticleYesURL of the article being responded to
dateYesPublication date of the response
summaryYesOne-sentence summary for indexes and meta description

Editorial principles

Verify the respondent. Confirm you're publishing a reply from who they claim to be. Don't publish anonymous responses in this format.

Don't edit for substance. Light copy-editing (spelling, punctuation) is acceptable. Removing arguments or changing meaning is not. If you can't publish the response as written, decline it — don't publish a sanitized version without disclosing the changes.

Add an editorial note if needed. You can prepend or append an italicized editor's note below the front matter block:

*Editor's note: This response was submitted by Director Smith on April 18, 2026, in reply to coverage published April 15. It has been lightly edited for spelling and formatted for the web.*

Link from the original article. After publishing the response, edit the original article to link to it. Project Broadsheet doesn't do this automatically — it requires a manual front matter addition.

In the original article's front matter:

relatedResponses:
  - /responses/city-official-reply/

Corrections vs. responses

A correction fixes a factual error made by the publication. A response gives the other side a platform. They're not interchangeable. If a response reveals a factual error, publish both: correct the original article and publish the response.

See Corrections for the correction workflow.

What to do next

Still need help?

Browse Support for community channels and paid support options, or book a call if you'd like me to set it up for you.