Superdesk is a full newsroom system made by Sourcefabric. It's used by news organisations and wire services that manage hundreds of writers, editors, and production steps. Project Broadsheet and Superdesk don't really compete — they're built for very different-sized operations. This page explains how they differ, so you can tell which one you actually need.

The short version

Project BroadsheetSuperdesk
Built forIndependent writers and small teamsLarge newsrooms and wire services
How it runsFiles you keep, hosted on a free serviceA large setup of several services running together
Starting costNothingJust the infrastructure — but that's non-trivial
Where the writing livesPlain text files on your computerA structured news-industry format, in a database
Editorial workflowLight — review, then publishFull — desks, stages, approvals, assignments
Publishing toThe webWeb, print, wire, social, syndication
Reader featuresBuilt inNot the focus
LicenceOpen-source (MIT)Open-source (AGPLv3)

What Superdesk is for

Superdesk is a newsroom. It's designed around the way large organisations produce news: a story moves from reporter to editor to fact-checker to production to published, with a formal step at each point. It handles output to more than one place (a web site, a print PDF, a syndicated wire feed, social channels) from a single source. It has roles, permissions, desk assignments, scheduling, and an events module.

If your operation has more than about twenty writers and editors, Superdesk starts to make sense.

What Project Broadsheet is for

Project Broadsheet is designed for one to a handful of writers, publishing to a single audience. The editorial process is light — write a draft, someone reviews it, it goes live — and the output is a web site with a feed. There's no multi-channel pipeline, no desk system, no formal sign-off chain.

What it takes to run

Superdesk needs a coordinated setup of several services running together — a document database, a search service, a queue, a web back end, and a front end — usually deployed with container tools and a sysadmin who's comfortable with all of it. Sourcefabric offers managed hosting if that's easier.

Project Broadsheet is plain files served by a static host. Cloudflare Pages or Netlify handle everything. There's no always-running server to look after.

How each keeps the writing

Superdesk stores articles as structured documents, with the kind of detail a wire service needs — metadata, associations, publishing channels, and so on. That's why syndicating the same piece to a web site, a printed paper, and a wire feed works.

Project Broadsheet stores articles as plain text files, aimed at a web site. For syndication or print, that format doesn't carry the same structure Superdesk's does.

How work moves through the system

Superdesk has a formal editorial process. A story is "in progress", "submitted", "in review", "approved", "scheduled", "published". Different roles have different permissions — a reporter can't publish without an editor's sign-off.

Project Broadsheet's process is lighter: a writer saves a draft, an editor reviews the change, and once it's approved the change goes live. That works for a small team. It doesn't scale to the formal sign-off chains of a large newsroom.

When Superdesk is the right fit

When Project Broadsheet is the right fit

Both are open-source

Neither one locks you to a company. Both can be taken and modified. Superdesk's licence (AGPLv3) has stronger copyleft requirements than Project Broadsheet's (MIT) — that matters mainly if you plan to offer a hosted version of Superdesk to other people as a paid service.

Where to next